User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; de-de; SGH-T679M Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-T679M Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15502 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungSGH-T679Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungSGH-T679Msmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungSGH-T679Mcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5SamsungGalaxy Exhibit IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3SamsungSGH-T679MSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.09701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:58 | by ThaDafinser