User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) PhantomJS/1.6.0 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
PhantomJS 1.6.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.13501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.183 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
PhantomJS 1.6.0closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.34Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PhantomJS 1.6.0Webkit 534.34OS X desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:58 | by ThaDafinser