User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.23FreeBSD Gecko 26.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.23Gecko FreeBSD Desktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.23closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.177 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.23Gecko FreeBSD desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.23closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.23closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.23closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.093 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.23Gecko 20100101FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.23Gecko 26.0FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:58 | by ThaDafinser