User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0 NokiaN97-5/10.2.020; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) BrowserNG/7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN97-5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaN97 minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.181 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0NokiaN97smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 10.2.020;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaN97-5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia Browser 7closeSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia N97-5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser 7Webkit 525Series60 5.0NokiaN97 Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4NokiaN97 miniFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:57 | by ThaDafinser