User agent detail

SV1 Android Application (16, sv1 v2.2.2) - LGE LG-E410i lge - FFFFFFFF-901B-D8D4-78CF-32FF3C17DB5B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGE410i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SV1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid LGOptimus L1 IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android LGLGsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid LGE410icloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android LGLGE410icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android LGOptimus L1 IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:56 | by ThaDafinser