User agent detail

SonyEricssonW100i/1.0 Browser/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Sony EricssonSpirofeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW100i 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonSpiromobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonSpirofeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonW100icloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W100icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonSpiromobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonW100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:55 | by ThaDafinser