User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.0; AVPersonalSerial 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 6.0Windows 2000Trident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 9.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows 2000desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 9.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:55 | by ThaDafinser