User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; KFJWA Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.42 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 31.0.1650.42Android 4.0.4Blink AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" 4Gtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.251 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.0AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" 4Gtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.0.4AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9" 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.42WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Blink FireOS AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9"tabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.42closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.0AmazonKFJWATabletyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:53 | by ThaDafinser