User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ARCHOS 80 COBALT Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 18.0.1025.166Android 4.0.4WebKit Archos80 COBALTtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.20502 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.247 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Archos80 COBALTtabletyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4Archos80 COBALTcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4Archos80 Cobalttabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Archos80 CobaltTabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:52 | by ThaDafinser