User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ210c/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ210c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonJ210cMobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ210c R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonJ210cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonJ210cfeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonJ210ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J210ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonJ210cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ210cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:51 | by ThaDafinser