User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; NetSeer crawler/2.0; +http://www.netseer.com/crawler.html; crawler@netseer.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
NetSeer crawler 2.0 yesNetSeer CrawlerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNetSeer CrawlerBot/Crawler0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNetSeer crawlerclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesNetSeer CrawlerCrawler0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetSeer Crawler 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.516 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:51 | by ThaDafinser