User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.6; en-US; ONE_TOUCH_4007D) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.2.389 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
UC Browser 9.0.2.389Android 2.3.6 AlcatelOne Touch 4007Dsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close AlcatelOT-4007Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0 Android 2.3AlcatelOne Touch 4007Dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 2.3.6closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.196 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.389 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android 2.3.6AlcatelOne Touch Piximobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:51 | by ThaDafinser