User agent detail

LGE-AD5235/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26l
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGAD5235 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGAD5235Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-AD5235 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26lclose LG5235mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGAD5235smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close LGAD5235closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26l closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.399 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 LGAD5235mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LG5235Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.09701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:50 | by ThaDafinser