User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Web Preview) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesGoogle Web PreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Web PreviewBot/Crawler0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeiPhone OS 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit 537.36iOS 5.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Web Previewclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Web Previewclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:50 | by ThaDafinser