User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux sh4 ; U; HBBTV/1.0 (; LOH/1.00; -----;;;) CE-HTML/1.0 Config(L:de,CC:AT); en) Presto/2.5.21 Version/10.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 10.30GNU/Linux Presto 2.5.21tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.30closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.30Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL40EX725tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.30closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.30closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.30closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.159 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.30Presto 2.5.21Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices Presto 2.5.21 televisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.30closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:50 | by ThaDafinser