User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE garmin-asus-Nuvifone-M20/1.0 Mozilla/4.0 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusNuvifone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows CE Garmin-AsusNuvifone-M20smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows CE AsusNuvifonecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile Garmin-AsusNuvifone M20mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:49 | by ThaDafinser