User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) AZ2CVT2; CC/CAN; en) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 2.9 Presto 2.7.61SonySmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyDTV115smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.0closeLinux SonyDTV115closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.7.61Linux Sony Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.555 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonySmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:49 | by ThaDafinser