User agent detail

HTC_Smart_F3188 Mozilla/5.0 (like Gecko) Obigo/Q7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSmart_F3188 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA HTCSmart F3188Mobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 7close HTCSmart F3188mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q7 HTCSmart F3188smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7close HTCSmart_F3188closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.2 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q7 Browser Q7 HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7 HTCSmart F3188mobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q7close HTCSmart F3188Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:49 | by ThaDafinser