User agent detail

LG-LG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189 OBIGO/WAP20 PROFILE/MIDP-21 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGLG-LG420Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo WAP20 LG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 20close LG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP20 Browser WAP20 LGLGLG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 20 LGLG420GTF012466003504817001294015202413189mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG-LG420GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:49 | by ThaDafinser