User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.2.1; zh-cn; GT-S5570; 240*320) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
UC Browser 7.9Android 2.2unknown SamsungGalaxy MiniMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy MiniMobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux SamsungGT-S5570smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGT-S5570closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94 Linux SamsungGalaxy Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.044 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:49 | by ThaDafinser