User agent detail

LG-A310-Orange/V10c Obigo/Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGA310 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-A310-Orange V10ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q7 LGA310smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.3close LGA310closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.152 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q7 Browser Q7 LGLGA310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.3 LGA310mobile:featureyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:48 | by ThaDafinser