User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (13, vmvid v2.1) - TCT ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 6033X TCT - FFFFFFFF-E131-705E-FFFF-FFFFD5B64CAB
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ALCATELONE TOUCH 6033X Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android AlcatelONE TOUCH 6033X TCT - FFFFFFFF-E131-705E-FFFF-FFFFD5B64CABsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid ALCATELONE TOUCH 6033Xcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.18102 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:46 | by ThaDafinser