User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Sony; KDL40EX725; PKG4.021EUA; 2011;);; en) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyKDL40EX725 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL40EX725tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSony 2011SonyKDL40EX725closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0Presto 2.7.61Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonyBravia EX725 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:46 | by ThaDafinser