User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; bq Aquaris 5 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60015
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
bqAquaris 5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60015closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.60015closeAndroid 4.2.1BQAquaris 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.2bqAquaris 5smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60015closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.2.1bqAquaris 5closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.60015WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.2.1bqAquaris 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60015closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15closeAndroid 4.2BQAquaris 5Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:44 | by ThaDafinser