User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.2.1; en-US; Vodafone_858) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
UC Browser 8.2.0.242Android 2.2.1 Vodafone858smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HuaweiVodafone 858mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.2Vodafone858smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.242 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 2.2.1Vodafone858 Smartmobile:smartyescloseclose0.07601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:44 | by ThaDafinser