User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-CN; vivo Y17T Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.6.1.401 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoY17T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2VivoY17Tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6WebKit Android 4.2VivoVivo Y17Tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.1closeAndroid 4.2.2vivoY17Tcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.1.401WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2VivoY17Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:44 | by ThaDafinser