User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090424 Shiretoko/3.5b5pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox Shiretoko (3.5)GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5b5precloseLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Shiretoko (3.5)Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Shiretoko 3.5b5precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Shiretoko) 3.5.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Shiretoko 3.5b5precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Shiretoko 3.5b5preGecko 20090424Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Shiretoko 3.5b5Gecko 1.9.1b5Linux desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:43 | by ThaDafinser