User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
Chrome 27.0.1453.93Mac OSX 10.7.5 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.25103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.93WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.93closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:43 | by ThaDafinser