User agent detail

Alcatel-OT-C700A/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOT-C700A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Alcatel-OT-C700A 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOT-C700Amobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C AlcatelOT-C700Asmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT-C700Acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48705 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C AlcatelOne Touch C700Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose AlcatelOT-C700AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:43 | by ThaDafinser