User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux armv6l; Maemo; Opera Mobi/8; U; xx; rv:2.8.2.6) Gecko/20082202 Firefox/3.5.8 Opera 12.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Opera Mobile Maemo Gecko 2.8.2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox Gecko Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.18302 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.12closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Maemo yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 12.12closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.8Gecko 20082202Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile Gecko 2.8.2Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:43 | by ThaDafinser