User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.9a3pre) Gecko/20070330
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Mozilla 1.9Linux unknown1.9 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9acloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9a3precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9a3preGecko 20070330Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9a3Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:42 | by ThaDafinser