User agent detail

SHARP-STX2/MC.40; Mozilla/5.0 (Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1; Opera Mini/att/4.2.19039; U; en-US) Opera 9.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Opera Mini 4.2.19039 Presto SharpSTX2smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 4.2Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.50close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.2Presto SharpSTX2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini attclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.2.19039close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 4.2 SharpSTX2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SharpSTX2Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:42 | by ThaDafinser