User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/531.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) AdobeAIR/2.5.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Adobe AIR 2.5WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Adobe AIR runtime 2.5.1closeWindows software-librarycloseclose0.28803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AdobeAIR 2.5.1closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Adobe AIR 2.5.1WebKit 531.9Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AdobeAIR 2.5.1Webkit 531.9Windows desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:41 | by ThaDafinser