User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.4.154.18 Safari/525.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Beta 0.4.154.18Windows XPWebkit 525.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 0.4WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.07201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.4.154.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 0.4.154.18closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 0.4WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.4.154.18closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.4.154closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 0.4.154.18closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 0.4.154.18WebKit 525.19Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 0.4.154.18Webkit 525.19Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.4.154.18closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:41 | by ThaDafinser