User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (13, ero247 v2.1) - samsung GT-P5100 samsung - FFFFFFFF-C460-CBF6-3F5E-92AA4B0BA0F8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
samsungGT-P5100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (10.1)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGALAXY Tab 2 10.1"tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid samsungGT-P5100closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (10.1)tabletyescloseclose0.04501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.07201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:41 | by ThaDafinser