User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 7.1Linux Gecko 1.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 7.1Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 7.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 7.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 7.1Gecko 20030624Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 7.1Gecko 1.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:41 | by ThaDafinser