User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-CN; NOMI L003 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.6.2.626 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 10.6.2.626Android 4.4.2WebKit NomiL003smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.6U3 Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.14401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.29803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.6WebKit Android 4.4NomiL003smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.6.2closeAndroid 4.4.2NOMI L003closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.6.2.626WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.6Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.2NOMI L003mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:40 | by ThaDafinser