User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36 OPR/23.0.1522.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-379.php
Opera 23.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 23.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 23.0.1522.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 23.0.1522.60closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 23.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 23.0.1522.60closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 23.0.1522closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 23.0.1522.60WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 23.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 23.0.1522.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 23.0.1522.60closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:40 | by ThaDafinser