User agent detail

Lenovo A690 Linux/2.6.35 Android/2.3.6 Release/10.25.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA690 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6LenovoA690mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA690smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 2.3.6LenovoA690closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6LenovoA690mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA690Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.12701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:39 | by ThaDafinser