User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; fr-be; Xenta TAB08-200 Build/Xenta TAB08-200) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Android Browser Android 4.1.1WebKit YarvikXenta 8ictablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1YarvikXenta 8ictabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1YarvikTAB08-200closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1YarvikXenta 8ictabletyescloseclose0.044 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:38 | by ThaDafinser