User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Profile/MIDP-1.0 MIDP-2.0) Minuet/3.1.3,SonyEricssonW580i/R8BE Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW580i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonW580imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonW580ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonW580icloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W580icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonW580imobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:37 | by ThaDafinser