User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140329 Firefox/24.0 PaleMoon/24.4.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
PaleMoon 24.4WinXP 5.124.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 24.4Gecko 24.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 24.4.2closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 24.4Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 24.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 24.4.2closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 24.4.2closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.13001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 24.4.2Gecko 20140329Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 24.4.2Gecko 24.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:37 | by ThaDafinser