User agent detail

Opera/9.60 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de) Presto/2.1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-099.php
Opera 9.60WinXP 5.12.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.60Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.60closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.60Presto Windows XPdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.60closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.60closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.60closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.60Presto 2.1.1Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.60Presto 2.1.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:37 | by ThaDafinser