User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S5320/S5320CJIF1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.4 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS5320 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S5320 S5320CJIF1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungS5320mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungS5320smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungS5320closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungS5320mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SamsungS5320Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:36 | by ThaDafinser