User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; special_archiver/3.2.0 +http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/notice_to_webmasters.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesInternet Archive Special ArchiverBot/Crawler0.10701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesArchive.orgclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesarchive.org botCrawler0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesarchiverclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesArchive.orgclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:36 | by ThaDafinser