User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Win32)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 95desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 32 closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:35 | by ThaDafinser