User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Page Speed Insights) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36 GoogleBot/2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGooglebot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsSite Monitor0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGoogleBotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:35 | by ThaDafinser