User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/534.52.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.1 Safari/534.51.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1.1OS X Lion 10.7Webkit 534.52.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.1closeOS X 10.7.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.1closeOS X 10.7.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.1closeMac OS X 10.7.2closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.1closeOS X 10.7.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.1WebKit 534.52.7Mac OS X 10.7.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.1Webkit 534.52.7OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.1.3closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:33 | by ThaDafinser