User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia501) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-asha.yaml
UC Browser 9.4Nokia Asha Platform 1.0Gecko NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close Nokia501mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Symbian Nokia501smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1close Nokia501closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.377 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 501closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Nokia Asha Platform 1.0NokiaAsha 501mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close Nokia501Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:33 | by ThaDafinser