User agent detail

SAMSUNG-M3510L/1.0 NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungM3510L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-M3510L 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungM3510Lsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungM3510Lcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungM3510Lmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:25:33 | by ThaDafinser